From Reaction to Position: A Framing Model of Brand Responses in the Digital Environment

Authors

  • Viktoriia Nikytenko Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman image/svg+xml Author https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7399-6556
    Competing Interests

    FROM THE EDITORS

    The journal’s editorial team appoints an editor to assist the author(s) in ensuring transparency regarding competing interests.

    This article belongs to the  "RESEARCH ARTICLES" section.
    Responsible editor Dmytro Oltarzhevskyi.

    Received: 27 February 2026.  Accepted: 20 July 2026.

    This article was prepared as part of the author’s independent research on strategic and crisis communication in the digital environment. The study is not related to any registered departmental research topic, grant-funded project, or externally funded program. The empirical material was collected from publicly available social media data and anonymized in accordance with ethical research standards. 

    STATEMENTS BY THE AUTHOR

    Conflict of Interest
    Not declared.

    Funding
    No funding was received for this study.

    Ethical Approval
    Ethical approval was not required for this study, as the research was based on publicly available anonymized data and did not involve human subjects or personal identifiable information.

    Informed Consent
    Not covered by the study.

    Consent for Publication
    Not covered by the study.

    Use of AI
    Author confirms that no artificial intelligence tools were used to create, write, or edit the text during the preparation of this manuscript. All results are original and obtained without the help of AI.
    During the preparation of the scientific article, artificial intelligence tools were used solely as an auxiliary means for linguistic editing and stylistic refinement of the English-language text. Artificial intelligence was not used for the development of the research hypothesis, the construction of the theoretical model, the collection, selection, or analysis of empirical material, the interpretation of research findings, or the formulation of scientific conclusions. All conceptual provisions, analytical categories, frames, conclusions, and scholarly interpretations are the result of the author’s independent academic work and are grounded in the author’s professional expertise, theoretical analysis, and inductive research approach. The author assumes full responsibility for the content of the article and for adherence to the principles of academic integrity.

    Permissions
    Not covered by the study.

    Acknowledgements
    The author thanks senior communication professionals for their practical insights that informed the empirical material of this study, as well as colleagues for their analytical feedback during manuscript preparation.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/CIMC.2026.40.8-20

Keywords:

strategic communication, framing analysis, digital crisis communication, social media responses, reputational management

Abstract

This study examines public brand responses in the digital environment as a form of strategic communication based on framing rather than as isolated reactive actions. Drawing on framing theory and contemporary research in crisis and reputational communication, the article assumes that the systematic use of stable response frames enables organizations to manage reputational tension and maintain communicative subjectivity under conditions of continuous public visibility on social media. Method. The empirical material consists of anonymized public interactions between a Ukrainian brand with international presence and its audiences on social media platforms, including responses to comments from end consumers, professional communities, and B2B stakeholders. Using a qualitative, inductive research design, the study applies framing analysis to retrospectively collected practice-based data. Communicative stimuli were classified, and recurring logics of public responses were reconstructed and conceptualized as strategic response frames. The results identify several recurrent types of public inquiries that generate reputational tension, such as misinformation, delegitimization attempts, emotional dissatisfaction, integrity-related doubts, and demands for authenticity and transparency, and demonstrate a stable correspondence between these inquiry types and dominant response frames. The findings indicate that public responses function not only reactively but also as sense-making mechanisms that structure the interpretive field around the brand. The study contributes to crisis and strategic communication theory by extending event-driven reactive models toward a continuous framing perspective and offers practical implications for developing internal response protocols and communication playbooks in high-visibility and reputation-sensitive digital contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

References

Abboodi, B., Pileggi, S., Bharathy, G. (2023). Social networks in crisis management: A literature review. Social Networks and Crisis Management, 3(3), 84. https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8392/3/3/84

Abiodun, G., & Nwabueze, E. A. (2025). Social media as a tool for crisis communication: A review of strategies and case studies (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 5219257). Social Sci-ence Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5219257

Başaran, D. (2024). Exploring the impact of social media crisis management on customer trust and corporate reputation: The case of Starbucks Turkiye. Research Journal of Business and Management, 11(2), 94-111. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2024.1949

Bielecka, H., Feifei, H., Strzelecki, А. (2025). Antecedents and management strategies of social media crises and their efficacy. European Journal of Management & Business Econom-ics. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJMBE-08-2024-0271

Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (Eds.). (2022). The handbook of crisis communication (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Cornelissen, J. P. (2020). Corporate communication: A guide to theory and practice (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Eriksson, M., & Olsson, E. K. (2016). Facebook and Twitter in crisis communication: A comparative study of professionals and citizens. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 24(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12116

Genovino, F. (2025). Exploring corporate reputation and crisis communication dynamics. Jour-nal of Corporate Reputation and Crisis Management. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-024-00353-8

Heide, M., & Simonsson, C. (2021). What was that all about? On internal crisis communication and communicative coworkership during a pandemic. Journal of Communication Man-agement, 25(3), 256-275. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-09-2020-0105

Jin, Y., Liu, B. F., & Austin, L. L. (Eds.). (2012). Social media and crisis communica-tion. Routledge

Larisu, Z., & Zulham. (2024). Crisis communication on social media: Managing reputation and maintaining public trust. Journal of Dialogos, 1(4). https://doi.org/10.62872/dp3kv868

van der Meer, T. G. L. A., & Jin, Y. (2020). Seeking Formula for Misinformation Treatment in Public Health Crises: The Effects of Corrective Information Type and Source. Health Communication, 35(5), 560–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1573295

Zhaldak, H. P., & Kozii, U. M. (2024). The role of social media in crisis communication in the modern business context. Ekonomika, Menedzhment i Marketynh, 11, 417-424. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2024-11-417-424

Downloads

Published

22-09-2026

Data Availability Statement

The analytical materials underlying this study are publicly available in the Zenodo repository at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18801927 
The repository contains anonymized analytical tables corresponding to Tables 1–3 presented in the article. 

How to Cite

Nikytenko, V. (2026). From Reaction to Position: A Framing Model of Brand Responses in the Digital Environment. Current Issues of Mass Communication, 40, 8-20. https://doi.org/10.17721/CIMC.2026.40.8-20

Most read articles by the same author(s)