Lexical Constructions of Manipulative Texts in Telegram Channels of War Time (on the Example of Coverage of The Crimea Issue)

Authors

  • Vitalii Semchenko V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Ukraine Author https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4635-6010
      Competing Interests

      Сonflict of interest: The author declares no conflict of interest.

    DOI:

    https://doi.org/10.17721/CIMC.2025.37.66-75

    Keywords:

    manipulative texts, Telegram channels, Crimean issue, linguistic markers, informational con-frontation, narratives, lexical constructions

    Abstract

    The article examines the features of manipulative texts in Telegram channels covering the Crimean issue in wartime conditions. Method. Based on the content analysis of 15 Telegram channels, the linguistic markers of manipulative influence, mechanisms for narrative formation, and the role of lexical constructions in creating informational confrontation are analyzed. Key manipulation strategies are identified, including selection of information, implicatures, polarization, dramatization, euphemizing, and dysphemization, which are used by pro-Ukrainian and pro-Russian sources to legitimize their own positions and delegitimize the positions of their opponents.

    Downloads

    Download data is not yet available.

    References

    Van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and power: Contributions to critical discourse studies. Palgrave Macmillan

    Benkler, Y., Faris, R., & Roberts, H. (2018). Network propaganda: Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. Oxford University Press

    Bhatia, A. (2015). Discursive illusions in public discourse: Theory and practice. Routledge

    Marwick, A., & Lewis, R. (2017). Media manipulation and disinformation online. Data & Society Re-search Institute

    Published

    30-06-2025

    How to Cite

    Semchenko, V. (2025). Lexical Constructions of Manipulative Texts in Telegram Channels of War Time (on the Example of Coverage of The Crimea Issue). Current Issues of Mass Communication, 37, 66-75. https://doi.org/10.17721/CIMC.2025.37.66-75