Newsmakers and news sources in the “hybrid media system” (the case of the full-scale Russian invasion coverage)




hybrid media system, online mass media, new media, Telegram, Ukraine


The study aims to compare leading newsmakers’ and news sources’ usage in a professional mass media and a Telegram channel. The computer-assisted method of news processing was used. As a result, we discovered that audiences of both professional mass media and new media consume the same content in different forms, and they deal with mostly the same newsmakers, with more considerable attention towards personalities for the Telegram channel and with more quotes from other mass media and accurate references for the online mass media. Therefore, we concluded that the general observation about the coexistence of professional and new media, where the former publishes classic “hard” news and the latter entertains people with information, may be questioned.


Download data is not yet available.


Abdukaya, F. (2022). Difficulties of journalists in accessing information in the process of news production. Electronic Journal of New Media, 6(2), 131–144.

Badr, H. (2021). Before the ‘Arab Spring’: How challengers pushed counter-issues in Egypt’s hybrid media system. Media, War & Conflict, 14(4), 522–541.

Blach- Ørsten, M., Eberholst, M. K., & Burkal, R. (2017). From hybrid-media system to hybrid-media politicians: Danish politicians and their cross-media presence in the 2015 national election campaign. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 14(4), 334–347.

Bruns, A. (2003). Gatewatching, not gatekeeping: Collaborative online news. Media International Australia Incorporating Culture and Policy, 107, 31–44.

Caren, N., Andrews, T. A., & Lu, T. Contemporary social movements in a hybrid media environment. The Annual Review of Sociology, 46, 443–465.

Chadwick, A. (2017). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Davis, N. (2009). Flat Earth news: An award-winning reporter exposes falsehood, distortion, and propaganda in the global media. London: Vintage UK.

Detector Media (2015). Regional’ni sayity: na koho i dlya koho pratsyuut’ [For whom and what for do regional websites work].

Shah, D., S., Friedland, L., Wells, C., Kim, Y., & Rojas, H. (2012). Communication, consumers, and citizens: Revisiting the politics of consumption. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644(1), 6-18.

Edgerly, S., & Vraga, E. K. (2019). News, entertainment, or both? Exploring audience perceptions of media genre in a hybrid media environment. Journalism, 20(6), 807–826.

Goldhaber, M. (1997, April 4). The attention economy and the net. First Mind.

Gustafsson, N. (2010). This time it’s personal: Social networks, viral politics and identity management. In D. Riha & A. Rodopi (Eds.), Emerging practices in cyberculture and social networking (pp. 3-24). Leiden: Brill.

Han, W. (2020). Research on the production mode and Communication Model of News Content in the new media electronic era. Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

IMI (2022, September 26). Dev’yat’ onlajn-media, scho staly najyakisnishymy: Monitoryng IMI [Nine online-media that were recognized as the most qualitative: IMI’s Monitoring].

Joyce, Y., & Cheng, Y. (2022). Assessing the impact of digital alternative news media in a hybrid news environment: Cases from Taiwan and Hong Kong. Journalism and Media, 3(3), 568–593.

Kitchens, B., Johnson, S. L., & Gray, P. (2020). Understanding Echo Chambers and Filter Bubbles: The impact of social media on diversification and partisan shifts in news consumption. MIS Quarterly, 44(4), 1619-1649.

Liu, X. (2022). Impact of personalized recommendation on today’s news communication through algorithmic mechanism in the new media era. Hindawi Advances in Multimedia. Article ID 1284071, 8 pages.

Mattoni, A., & Ceccobelli, D. (2018). Comparing hybrid media systems in the digital age: A theoretical framework for analysis. European Journal of Communication, 33(5), 1-18.

McCombs, M., & Valenzuela, S. (2020). Setting the agenda: Mass media and public opinion. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Newman et al. (2022). Reuters institute digital news report 2022. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.

Newman, N., Dutton, W. H., & Blank, G. (2012). Social media in the changing ecology of news: The Fourth and Fifth Estates in Britain. International Journal of Internet Science, 7(1), 6–22.

Pyrhönen, N., & Bauvois, G. (2020). Conspiracies beyond Fake News. Producing reinformation on presidential elections in the transnational hybrid media system. Sociological Inquiry, 90(4), 705–731.

Schroeder, R. (2018). Social theory after the internet media, technology, and globalization. London: UCL Press.

Steblyna, N. (2020). Cyfrovizaciya derzhavnoyi polityky u konteksti transformaciyi suchasnoho svitoporyadku [State politics digitalization in the context of modern world order transformation]. Odesa: Phoenix.

Sumiala, J., Tikka, M. Huhtamäk J., & Valaskivi, K. (2016). #JeSuisCharlie: Towards a multi-method study of hybrid media events. Media and Communication, 4(4), 97-108.

Wells, C. et al. (2016). How Trump drove coverage to the nomination: Hybrid media campaigning. Political Communication, 33(4), 669-676.




How to Cite

Newsmakers and news sources in the “hybrid media system” (the case of the full-scale Russian invasion coverage). (2023). Current Issues of Mass Communication, 33, 34-43.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 17

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>