Waves of disinformation in the hybrid Russian-Ukrainian war

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/CIMC.2023.33.12-25

Keywords:

hybrid war, political discourse, waves of disinformation, fake narratives

Abstract

This article presents research results into waves of disinformation — massive torrents of false information directed at various audiences during the Russian-Ukrainian war in May — July 2022, intending to elicit specific communication effects (manipulation, misleading, intimidation, demoralization, etc.). It was found that waves of disinformation are characterized by narrative and intensity. Based on the Telegram statistics of the “Perevirka” bot (“Check”) developed by the Gwara Media organization, we formed a sample of the most resonant messages (298 units), which were subject to informal (traditional) document analysis, as well as classification, narrative, and comparative analysis. We identified 24 primary waves of disinformation, among which the most powerful were the following: 1) “The Armed Forces of Ukraine and those who back them are criminals”; 2) “Ukraine will lose the war”; 3) “The West does not need Ukraine as a state”; 4) “Ukraine is a country of chaos and extremists.” The recorded waves testify to the aggressiveness and multi-directionality of Russian rhetoric, which encourages the development of a productive system of information countermeasures in Ukraine and the world and the development of media literacy among the population. Based on the analysis of waves of Russian disinformation, we provided recommendations for the audience on dealing with actual and potential propaganda messages.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bachmann, Lukas. Hybride Bedrohungen (2020). Velbrück Wissenschaft, 192 S.

Batsevych, F. & Sazonova, Y. (2020). Aktualni problemy suchasnoyi lingvonaratologiyi [Cur-rent problems of modern linguistic narratology]. Visnyk Lvivskogo Universytety. Seriya filologichna [Journal of Lviv University. Filological Set], 72, 273-281.

Bell, Alice, and Marie-Laure Ryan, eds. Possible worlds theory and contemporary narratology. University of Nebraska Press, 2019.

Dorothy E. Denning (1988). Information Warfare and Security Addison-Wesley Professional, 544 р.

Fact-checking methodology in Gwara Media and bot Perevirka (2022). https://gwaramedia.com/metodologiya-faktchekingu-perevirka/

From “Trukha” to Gordon: the most popular channels of Ukrainian segment of Telegram (2022). https://detector.media/monitorynh-internetu/article/202665/2022-09-09-vid-trukhy-do-gordona-naypopulyarnishi-kanaly-ukrainskogo-segmenta-telegram/

Gulievska, G. & Adashys, L. (2021). Kontseptsiya biznesu ta prav liudyny v konteksti suchasnykh globalnykh trendiv [Concept of business and human rights in the context of current global trends]. Filosofiya Prava ta Zahalna Teoriya Prava [Philosophy of Law and General Theory of Law], № 1, 48-63.

Hoffman Frank (2007). Conflict in the 21st Century: The Rise of Hybrid Wars. Arlington: Potomac Institute for Policy Studies

Jerit J. & Zhao Y. (2020). Political misinformation. Annual Review of Political Science, 23, 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050718-032814

Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Jerit, J., Schwieder, D., & Rich, R. F. (2000). Misinformation and the Currency of Democratic Citizenship. The Journal of Politics, 62(3), 790–816. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2647960

Lewandowsky S., Ecker Ullrich K. H., Cook J. (2017). Beyond Misinformation: Understanding and Coping with the «Post-Truth» Era // Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 6 (4) Р. 353–369.

Lyotard, J.-F. (1995). Sytuatsiya postmodernu [Postmodern condition]. Filosofska i sotsiolog-ichna dumka [Philosophical and Sociological Thought], № 5-6, 15-38.

Magda, Y. V. (2015). Gibrydna viyna: vyzhyty i peremohty [Hybrid war: how to survive and win]. Kharkiv: Vivat.

Mylchenko, L. (2021). Informatsiynyi vplyv rosiyskykh ZMI yak zasib gibrydnoyi viyny proty Ukrainy [Informational influence of Russian media as a tool of hybrid war against Ukraine]. Visnyk Knyzhkovoyi Palaty [Journal of Book Chamber of Ukraine], № 10, 8-16.

Nine online media that became the most qualitative: monitoring of IMI (2022). https://imi.org.ua/monitorings/dev-yat-onlajn-media-shho-staly-najyakisnishymy-monitoryng-imi-i47998

Pohl L. (2022). Russlands Intervention im Ukraine-Konflikt: Gründe für den Einsatz von Mit-teln hybrider Kriegsführung. Universität zu Köln — 98 S.

Rosenblum, N. L. & Muirhead, R. (2019). A Lot of People Are Saying: The New Conspiracism and the Assault on Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Stanzel, F. K. (1984). A theory of narrative. Cambridge University Press.

Sunstein, C. & Vermeule, A. (2009). Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 17(2), 202-227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00325.x

Tolmachov, O & others (2022). Khvyli desinformatsiyi vesny-lita 2022 roku: analiz Gwara Media [Disinformation waves during spring – summer 2022: Analysis of Gwara Media]. https://gwaramedia.com/analiz-gwara-media-pro-hvili-dezinformaczii-v-travni-lipni-2022-roku/

Veshchykova, O. (2020). Kategoriya pamyati yak object kognityvnoyi naratologii [Memory category as an object of cognitive narratology]. Khudozhni Fenomeny v Istorii ta Suchasnosti: Tezy Dopovidei VI Mizhnarodnoyi Naukovoyi Conferencii [Art Phenomena in History and Modernity: Reports of VI International Scientific Conference “Memory and Identity”]. Kharkiv: Brovin, № 1, 26-27.

Downloads

Published

30-06-2023

How to Cite

Waves of disinformation in the hybrid Russian-Ukrainian war. (2023). Current Issues of Mass Communication, 33, 12-25. https://doi.org/10.17721/CIMC.2023.33.12-25

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>